vExpertAIWhat matters
The exposures actually reachable in your topology — not CVSS noise.
Sovereign · on-prem · never touches production
01
02
03
04
05
Prove what an attacker reaches. Prove you closed it. Show the board a signed record.
vExpertAI safely breaches a digital twin of your environment — never production — to prove exactly which systems an attacker can reach, then proves the fix worked. You get a cryptographically-signed Proof-of-Resilience your board, regulator and insurer accept. 100% on your own hardware. Nothing leaves your walls.
✔ Never touches production
✔ Runs on your hardware · no outbound path
✔ AI proposes · code decides · a human approves
A pentest tells you a door was open. We hand you signed proof you closed it. — Proven, not recommended.
Attack a twin
A real attacker's path, chained — on a copy, never your live network.
See what's reached
Demonstrated reachability, with a reproducible trace. Not an opinion.
Close it
Apply the fix; a human approves anything real.
Re-prove
Re-run the same attack. Signed proof it now fails.
Why now
Your board no longer accepts "we think we're secure."
Regulators want evidence of control effectiveness. Insurers price you on provable posture. Attackers move faster than an annual pentest can see. And you can't send any of it to a cloud AI. "Recommended" no longer survives a board meeting, an audit, or a claim.
Reports don't survive an audit
A scanner hands you a list of what might be exploitable. Your board funds provable risk reduction with an artifact attached — not vibes.
A pentest is a photograph
Point-in-time, sampled, stale the next day. New CVEs land daily; last quarter's assessment never saw them.
Cloud AI can't come in
Sending your topology and telemetry to a cloud service is a non-starter under data-localization and sovereignty mandates.
Autonomy without a gate is a liability
An AI that can touch production without deterministic validation and human approval raises your risk — it doesn't lower it.
What you're actually deciding
The four questions that decide whether you let us in the building.
We answer them before you scroll — because they're the ones that matter.
CAN I LET AI NEAR PRODUCTION?You never do.
We attack a digital twin — a copy of your estate — never your live network. The only thing that ever reaches production is a signed PDF.
WHERE DO THE MODELS & DATA LIVE?On your hardware. Nowhere else.
The engine runs in your rack, on your GPUs, on a network you control, with no outbound path. Model updates are files you carry in. We cannot see your environment — by construction, not by policy.
HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT FROM MY PENTEST?A pentest guesses. We prove.
A pentest tells you what's probably exploitable, once a year. We prove what an attacker actually reaches — and prove your fix closed it. Same test, before and after.
WHAT IF THE AI IS WRONG?The AI never has the last word.
The AI proposes; deterministic code decides; a human approves anything that touches a real system. And it's only ever wrong on the twin — never on your production network.
What you walk away with
Hand your auditor proof they can verify themselves.
Every engagement ends in a Proof-of-Resilience — a signed, hash-chained, tamper-evident record. Your GRC team, your regulator, and your insurer verify the signature independently. No trust in us required. Board-ready, not engineer-only.
The attack path executed — and exactly what the attacker reached
The fix applied, and signed before/after evidence the path is closed
A one-page executive attestation for board, regulator and insurer
Verifiable with a public key alone — alter one character and it fails
minutes
breach to signed proof
~200d
industry average just to notice a breach
0
bytes of anything leave your perimeter
1
signed record your auditor verifies
We are explicit about what's proven versus modeled. A result is only called verified when the fix is re-attacked on a live twin and the exploit genuinely fails. Where a component is modeled rather than live-exploited, we label it as such — we never dress a modeled outcome as a verified one. In a signed-proof business, that honesty is the product.
How you start
Start where the risk is lowest. Every step is reversible.
It begins with a free 15-minute fit call — an honest yes/no on whether your environment is a fit, no twin, no data, no commitment. Then you climb only as far as the proof earns.
Exposure Mapping day
€4,900 / 1 day
- A day with your team, breaching a scoped twin — your network is never touched
- You leave with a Prioritized Exposure Map + a scoped pilot plan you own outright
- Fee credited 100% if you continue — keep the map either way
Proof-of-Resilience engagement
Scoped, paid pilot · one crown-jewel system · signed proof in weeks
- We breach a twin of one crown-jewel system, prove what an attacker reaches, and prove the fix closed it
- Delivered as a signed Proof-of-Resilience dossier — keep the evidence even if you walk
- Workshop fee credited · a clean keep/kill decision · no auto-renew
Standing Proof
continuous validation
- Every change, every new CVE, every new segment re-validated — not once a year
- A signed board pack every quarter, straight into your audit and insurer cadence
- Source-available / BYO-GPU — you're never hostage to us
Fee credited · a clean keep/kill decision · runs on your hardware · you keep the evidence — even if you walk · nothing leaves your premises
Why a pilot pays for itself: proving — and proving closed — the exact path an attacker would take to your crown jewels costs a fraction of the breach you're preventing, and less than a single regulator finding or insurer premium hike. Both the pilot and full-estate Standing Proof are scoped to your environment, established with you in a fit call.
Sovereignty & control
You choose how much of it you own.
However you deploy, the data, the attacks, and the evidence stay inside your boundary — and you're never locked to us.
Source-available
inspect every line
- Runs on your own infrastructure; your team can audit exactly what executes
- We support, maintain and update — you keep control
Bring your own GPU
your compute
- Runs on your existing GPUs or a sovereign provider of your choice
- No compute dependency on us, no data leaving your control
Sovereign appliance
sealed, on-prem
- A self-contained appliance in your rack — no outbound path, no phone-home
- We build and maintain it; optional source escrow so you're never hostage
Under the hood · for your architects
The AI never makes a decision.
The hard part isn't the attack — it's proving, to a regulator, that the attack was safe, real, and closed, with an audit trail that survives cross-examination. Here's how the engine does that, and why an AI is never an unguarded actor.
Cairn
Ranks exposures by what's genuinely reachable and exploitable in your topology — the feed that decides what red even attempts. Explore Cairn →
Attacker & defender
An AI attacker finds the path; an AI defender proposes the fix. Both sandboxed on the twin, both overruled by deterministic code.
No LLM in the decision path
A deterministic verification layer maps every action to a risk tier, predicts blast radius, and holds a kill switch. No model can act. Two of your own staff approve, cryptographically, anything real.
Signed, hash-chained proof
Every step is written to an append-only, Ed25519-signed, tamper-evident ledger — replayable per incident, verifiable with a public key alone.
Who you'll work with
Eduard Dulharu
Founder & CTO
Twenty years in network and security architecture, six of them in NATO environments. vExpertAI exists because the assurance regulated teams actually need — provable, on their own infrastructure — can't live in the cloud. We deploy on-site with your team, then work from base with a specialist R&D group behind every engagement.
20+ years networking & security6 years NATO environments◇ sovereign by design
One call. Fifteen minutes.
Tell us your environment. We'll prove what a real attacker reaches.
No pitch deck — a working conversation about your stack, your constraints, and the smallest safe way to turn "we think we're secure" into a signed record your board accepts.